This is a live demo with sample data. You'll do the same with your own deductions.
I dispute this deduction in full. After a 2-year tenancy, routine cleaning is fair wear and tear. The property was professionally cleaned on 10 March 2025 (receipt attached, Exhibit A). The check-in inventory photos are of insufficient quality to establish that the property was in a cleaner condition at the start of the tenancy. The landlord's claim for "professional deep clean" constitutes betterment — seeking to return the property to a standard beyond its condition at check-in.
Evidence: Exhibit A (cleaning receipt), Exhibit B (check-out photos 1-4), Exhibit C (check-in inventory p.2)
I dispute $320 of this deduction. The check-in inventory (p.3) states the carpet was approximately 6 years old at the start of the tenancy, making it 8 years old at end of tenancy. Standard carpet lifespan is 10 years. The landlord may only claim for the remaining 2 years of expected life — 20% of $400 = $80. Charging $400 for full replacement of an 8-year-old carpet constitutes betterment.
Evidence: Exhibit C (inventory p.3 — carpet age), Exhibit D (email confirming carpet age), Exhibit B (check-out photos showing no burns)
I dispute this deduction in full. The check-in inventory (p.7) describes the living room as "recently painted" at the start of the tenancy. Interior paint has a 3-5 year lifespan. After 2 years, minor marks constitute fair wear and tear. A full repaint is betterment — the landlord is improving the property beyond its check-in condition.
Evidence: Exhibit C (inventory p.7 — "recently painted"), Exhibit B (check-out photos 5-8 showing minor marks only)
The app wrote a formal, court-ready demand letter using real legal tests. No lawyer. No hours of stressful writing. Just answer the questions and download.
No subscription. No hidden fees. Use it for this tenancy and every future one.
Get Started — $29 →30-day money-back guarantee — if you don't win, you don't pay.